I have often experienced "network weaving," where a conversation takes place across multiple platforms- like someone answering a Twitter question on Facebook, etc. This concept is becoming more and more common as we jam our lifestream feeds down multiple channels. I have always fed Twitter through Friendfeed and Facebook, and Utterli through Twitter and http://DougHaslam.com/. Some people don’t like to do that, but I find it lets me post in just a couple of places but reach entirely different people all over.
The challenge is keeping context. For example, now my FriendFeed comments go into Twitter. While I decide if I like that, I realize I need to add as much context as possible or risk confusing people; "Who is he talking to?" "What is the reference?"
I believe these cross-posted conversations can work. We must constantly remember our audience- and context.
How do you handle it?
Mobile post sent by DougH using Utterli. 
Replies. mp3
Hi Doug – I push tweets into Facebook and find a completely different audience responds to my questions and comments in there. I do consciously consider what I say on Twitter and how I say it. For example, I probably won’t live tweet a Red Sox game this year unless I’m prefacing Tweets with @ (these don’t hit my stream in Facebook). I push pretty much everything into FriendFeed, but have yet to push from FriendFeed. I’ll keep an eye on your “trials” before making any changes there.
Jim | @jstorerj
I have done the same– pushing Tweets to Facebook– for some time and have had the same reaction– sop many different people responding on Facebook that I will keep on doing it. I do try to provide context, but not saying I am always succeeding.
As for not live-tweeting Red Sox games? Umm, can’t commit to that yet, though my volume of Tweets during games generally went down this past season.
I’m the only one in this world. Can please someone join me in this life? Or maybe death…
Our local free internet radio, free internet calls
As you, I believe too the cross-posted conversations can work.