<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Posts for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doughaslam.com/2009/12/30/top-10-posts-for-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/12/30/top-10-posts-for-2009/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-10-posts-for-2009</link>
	<description>Gischeleman: &#34;To Create With the Mind&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/12/30/top-10-posts-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5363</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=2225#comment-5363</guid>
		<description>Mark-- Thanks!

I fished both of your comments out of my spam filter, since you added some thought to the 2nd try. 

I considered the &quot;underappreciated post&quot; idea but wanted to give Chris&#039; analytical method a go. 

I also note- as in #10, which was a late post that could rank higher, I had a post just last week (&quot;Faces of Death&quot;) that people liked and even inspired at least one other blogger to post. But, there was no time for cumulative traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark&#8211; Thanks!</p>
<p>I fished both of your comments out of my spam filter, since you added some thought to the 2nd try. </p>
<p>I considered the &#8220;underappreciated post&#8221; idea but wanted to give Chris&#8217; analytical method a go. </p>
<p>I also note- as in #10, which was a late post that could rank higher, I had a post just last week (&#8220;Faces of Death&#8221;) that people liked and even inspired at least one other blogger to post. But, there was no time for cumulative traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/12/30/top-10-posts-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=2225#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>2nd try...

I like the list.  I tried my own variation this year where I focused on posts that I liked but that didn&#039;t get a lot of traffic.

I particularly liked your #4 and #7.

Best wishes for 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd try&#8230;</p>
<p>I like the list.  I tried my own variation this year where I focused on posts that I liked but that didn&#8217;t get a lot of traffic.</p>
<p>I particularly liked your #4 and #7.</p>
<p>Best wishes for 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/12/30/top-10-posts-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5358</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=2225#comment-5358</guid>
		<description>I did a retrospective post, but I tried to pick out posts that I liked, but didn&#039;t get much traffic at all.  A second chance to see them, as it were.

Some of your titles are nigh irresistible, so I&#039;m checking them out.  Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a retrospective post, but I tried to pick out posts that I liked, but didn&#8217;t get much traffic at all.  A second chance to see them, as it were.</p>
<p>Some of your titles are nigh irresistible, so I&#8217;m checking them out.  Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

