I was listening to the Quick-n-Dirty podcast (http://bit.ly/qd917), hosted by friends Jennifer Leggio and Aaron Strout (also a client), when their guest, Michael Brito of Intel, said something I completely agree with.
"You don’t lose control of your message if you participate (in social media)."
I have long regarded the idea of "no message control" in social media as a myth. Michael’s point was that you lose control if you don’t step in and take part. I go further, saying you only really lose control if your message is bad and people reject it.
Where do you stand on message control?
This message has been sent using the picture and Video service from Verizon Wireless!
To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.
Note: To play video messages sent to email, Quicktime@ 6.5 or higher is required.
Mobile post sent by DougH using Utterli. 
Replies. mp3
Twitter Comment
Reading… RT @DougH: Blog: The Message Control Myth [link to post] thx @britopia @mediaphyter @aaronstrout for the spark
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Doug – a) thanks for the Q-n-D love and b) I couldn’t agree more. I think that brands only risk control if they DON’T participate in the conversation. To be clear, companies that don’t participate may still “tell” consumers what their message is… just like parents try and “tell” their teenage children what to do. However, it’s only through meaningful dialog (with some give and take) in both cases that actually has any impact at all.
Thanks for the big thought of the day (and for @Britopian for spawning it).
Best,
Aaron | @AaronStrout
Interesting topic – imho, any message that matters is one that really resonates with your peeps (your customers, partners, investors, etc. etc.) – once it resonates, it becomes part of your brand and while you can try to create positivity around your brand by making great stuff, the brand belongs to the audience. They made it, they control, treat them well and they will most often do the same.
Twitter Comment
RT @DougH: Blog: The Message Control Myth, [link to post], thx @britopia @mediaphyter @aaronstrout for the spark
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
From @DougH – Blog: The Message Control Myth [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
marketers should lose the word “control” from their vocabulary
Thanks all for comments– what i took most from this post, and thinking about it, was to merge the idea that a good message is important (my old axe) with the participation piece (Michael’s piece).
Keith, funny you should say that– in the audio version (embedded abive) I wonder exactly that– is the word “control” part of the problem?
Twitter Comment
RT @mediaphyter: From @DougH – Blog: The Message Control Myth [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
I’ll go the next half step forward, and tell you that Social Media can give you MORE control over the message.
The previous notion of “control” was based on ostrich-vision. Now you have an opportunity to scope and engage in very tactical ways – not only refining the message on the fly, but guaranteeing that the end result — the general synthesized impression — was closer to what you envisioned than past broadcasting afforded.
Ike- you sunk my battleship!
Way to up the game
Twitter Comment
RT @DougH @ikepigott took my “Message Control Myth” post to comment heaven: [link to post] (Losing brand control is another myth).
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Twitter Comment
@DougH both you and @ikepigott are right on the money with your “message.”
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Uh, it’s hard to top Ike’s genius. So, I’ll just say ‘yeah, what he said.’ ;-)
Now, Ike…look into your crystal ball and tell us how long will it be before organizations get this concept.
Beth Harte
Community Manager, MarketingProfs
@bethharte