Comments on: Obsession with Numbers is OK http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1573 Gischeleman: "To Create With the Mind" Mon, 07 May 2012 14:30:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: hadis http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2996 hadis Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:47:53 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2996 Exactly right, Doug. It’s not about “quantity” or “quality” alone, but rather the mix of the two. While it’d be nice to have 10 really high quality followers, it be nicer to have 20 Exactly right, Doug. It’s not about “quantity” or “quality” alone, but rather the mix of the two. While it’d be nice to have 10 really high quality followers, it be nicer to have 20

]]> By: F. Andy Seidl http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2994 F. Andy Seidl Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:30:26 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2994 Exactly right, Doug. It's not about "quantity" or "quality" alone, but rather the mix of the two. While it'd be nice to have 10 really high quality followers, it be nicer to have 20. At the same time its problematic to have 100 really bad followers (e.g., porn or gambling sites cluttering your follower list) and its even worse to have 200. So, its a balancing act. Growing a large, high-quality following is a worthy goal. Exactly right, Doug. It’s not about “quantity” or “quality” alone, but rather the mix of the two. While it’d be nice to have 10 really high quality followers, it be nicer to have 20. At the same time its problematic to have 100 really bad followers (e.g., porn or gambling sites cluttering your follower list) and its even worse to have 200.

So, its a balancing act. Growing a large, high-quality following is a worthy goal.

]]> By: Rachel Kay http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2993 Rachel Kay Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:27:53 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2993 Great post and I totally agree. One follower can be really high "quality" but there is a serious limit to what that one person can do for you. It's that happy medium between the quantity and who makes up the quantity. Great post and I totally agree. One follower can be really high “quality” but there is a serious limit to what that one person can do for you. It’s that happy medium between the quantity and who makes up the quantity.

]]> By: TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott ) http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2979 TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott ) Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:16:05 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2979 <strong>Twitter Comment</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/TS_Elliott" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"> <div title="TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott )" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://doughaslam.com/wp-content/plugins/chatcatcher/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> <div title="TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott )" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/TS_Elliott) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> </a> @shelisrael AWWWW, to be 17 again!!!<br /><br /> - Posted using Chat Catcher Twitter Comment


@shelisrael AWWWW, to be 17 again!!!

– Posted using Chat Catcher

]]> By: matt Searles http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2978 matt Searles Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:38:39 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2978 Dough -- clearly satanic! Shel Israel -- For me the number to worry about was always 35.. That being went Dante found him self that dark wood.. and being 35 now, it all seems quite prophetic Dough — clearly satanic!

Shel Israel — For me the number to worry about was always 35.. That being went Dante found him self that dark wood.. and being 35 now, it all seems quite prophetic

]]> By: Doug Haslam http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2977 Doug Haslam Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:31:39 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2977 Matt-- ah, I see- but was spell check being Satanic or sardonic? Matt– ah, I see- but was spell check being Satanic or sardonic?

]]> By: shelisrael (shel israel) http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2975 shelisrael (shel israel) Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:12:05 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2975 <strong>Twitter Comment</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/shelisrael" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"> <div title="shelisrael (shel israel)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://doughaslam.com/wp-content/plugins/chatcatcher/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> <div title="shelisrael (shel israel)" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/shelisrael) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> </a> @TS_Elliott That proves my theories about the number 17. Irrefutable and profitable all at once.<br /><br /> - Posted using Chat Catcher Twitter Comment


@TS_Elliott That proves my theories about the number 17. Irrefutable and profitable all at once.

– Posted using Chat Catcher

]]> By: pcornqueen (pcornqueen) http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2974 pcornqueen (pcornqueen) Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:07:05 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2974 <strong>Twitter Comment</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/pcornqueen" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"> <div title="pcornqueen (pcornqueen)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://doughaslam.com/wp-content/plugins/chatcatcher/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> <div title="pcornqueen (pcornqueen)" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/pcornqueen) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> </a> RT @tweetmeme Doug Haslam » Blog Archive [link to post]<br /><br /> - Posted using Chat Catcher Twitter Comment


RT @tweetmeme Doug Haslam » Blog Archive [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

]]> By: matt Searles http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2973 matt Searles Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:02 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2973 Dough, I mean indignation.. but my spell check is being satanic today Dough, I mean indignation.. but my spell check is being satanic today

]]> By: TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott ) http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/comment-page-1/#comment-2972 TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott ) Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:29:05 +0000 http://doughaslam.com/2009/07/01/1573/#comment-2972 <strong>Twitter Comment</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/TS_Elliott" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"> <div title="TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott )" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://doughaslam.com/wp-content/plugins/chatcatcher/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> <div title="TS_Elliott (T.S. Elliott )" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/TS_Elliott) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;"> </div> </a> @shelisrael One time I put a stack on 17, 3 times and won 3,000 dollars --- It just came to me that 17 was the winner!! For real!!!<br /><br /> - Posted using Chat Catcher Twitter Comment


@shelisrael One time I put a stack on 17, 3 times and won 3,000 dollars — It just came to me that 17 was the winner!! For real!!!

– Posted using Chat Catcher

]]>