<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Top 5: It&#8217;s Not About You, Mr. Journalist, and Blogging is Not a Business Requirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement</link>
	<description>Gischeleman: &#34;To Create With the Mind&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Zingsheim</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Zingsheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2025</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that the picture and the point about context made my morning. Too funny/cute.

And again with the contrarian p.o.v.--I&#039;m okay with some companies deciding that engagement isn&#039;t right for them. Who is going to change their mind about Halliburton, for instance? The cost/benefit analysis on them engaging with their detractors would make it a losing proposition. Social media in its &quot;classic&quot; sense--connecting with the public--isn&#039;t necessary for all businesses. 

Monitoring, as I often point out, is different.

And re: Blago/PR firm quoting themselves...and I thought things there couldn&#039;t get any stranger. I stand corrected.

Jen
Jen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that the picture and the point about context made my morning. Too funny/cute.</p>
<p>And again with the contrarian p.o.v.&#8211;I&#8217;m okay with some companies deciding that engagement isn&#8217;t right for them. Who is going to change their mind about Halliburton, for instance? The cost/benefit analysis on them engaging with their detractors would make it a losing proposition. Social media in its &#8220;classic&#8221; sense&#8211;connecting with the public&#8211;isn&#8217;t necessary for all businesses. </p>
<p>Monitoring, as I often point out, is different.</p>
<p>And re: Blago/PR firm quoting themselves&#8230;and I thought things there couldn&#8217;t get any stranger. I stand corrected.</p>
<p>Jen<br />
Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>Thanks all-- I should note that my comment when I originally bookmarked this on de.licio.us was: &quot;I think we need to be flexible how &quot;blog&quot; is defined.&quot;  Twitter has proved there are plenty of avenues to accomplish swift communications-- and sometimes old channels may prove to be sufficient. Like Shell is fond of saying, &quot;it depends.&quot;

My reaction to the post is grounded chiefly in my natural reaction to absolutism. 

that said, I can;t see many better, fully-developed channels at this point then a blog.

And B.L., if a company doesn&#039;t want to engage, to me that&#039;s a problem, not a reason not to blog.

Yup, I&#039;ve got this issue surrounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all&#8211; I should note that my comment when I originally bookmarked this on de.licio.us was: &#8220;I think we need to be flexible how &#8220;blog&#8221; is defined.&#8221;  Twitter has proved there are plenty of avenues to accomplish swift communications&#8211; and sometimes old channels may prove to be sufficient. Like Shell is fond of saying, &#8220;it depends.&#8221;</p>
<p>My reaction to the post is grounded chiefly in my natural reaction to absolutism. </p>
<p>that said, I can;t see many better, fully-developed channels at this point then a blog.</p>
<p>And B.L., if a company doesn&#8217;t want to engage, to me that&#8217;s a problem, not a reason not to blog.</p>
<p>Yup, I&#8217;ve got this issue surrounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>Thanks Doug - it was from my BlogPotomac presentation, and just a blog post: http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/2008/06/art-of-strategy-or-how-i-like-to-say-no.html

And, @shel - you are right. I have been able to contain things on Twitter that normally would have exploded to blogs and/or mainstream news by being available and responsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Doug &#8211; it was from my BlogPotomac presentation, and just a blog post: <a href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/2008/06/art-of-strategy-or-how-i-like-to-say-no.html" rel="nofollow">http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/2008/06/art-of-strategy-or-how-i-like-to-say-no.html</a></p>
<p>And, @shel &#8211; you are right. I have been able to contain things on Twitter that normally would have exploded to blogs and/or mainstream news by being available and responsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>B.L., that thinking was entirely appropriate BT -- Before Twitter. Today, the use of the blog as a business communication channel is entirely different. It&#039;s a requirement because it is the ONLY widely accepted and monitored tool that allows an immediate response to a lightning-fast reputational crisis. Motrin needed one. United Airlines needed one. 

Remember, I used to take the same position. But there simply is no other vehicle that lets you get your position on the record fast enough to forestall significant damage as conversation about you spirals out of control while you (not you personally, of course) craft a press release or develop a statement for the home page of the website.

So, while many uses of the blog are the same, having one ready to respond (as Michael Hyatt did when Publisher&#039;s Weekly got Thomas Nelson&#039;s new policy wrong) is vital. Of course, if something else comes along that works as well, I&#039;ll be all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.L., that thinking was entirely appropriate BT &#8212; Before Twitter. Today, the use of the blog as a business communication channel is entirely different. It&#8217;s a requirement because it is the ONLY widely accepted and monitored tool that allows an immediate response to a lightning-fast reputational crisis. Motrin needed one. United Airlines needed one. </p>
<p>Remember, I used to take the same position. But there simply is no other vehicle that lets you get your position on the record fast enough to forestall significant damage as conversation about you spirals out of control while you (not you personally, of course) craft a press release or develop a statement for the home page of the website.</p>
<p>So, while many uses of the blog are the same, having one ready to respond (as Michael Hyatt did when Publisher&#8217;s Weekly got Thomas Nelson&#8217;s new policy wrong) is vital. Of course, if something else comes along that works as well, I&#8217;ll be all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janeth</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>Janeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>Quote: B.L. Ochman They’re the ones who need every word vetted by lawyers; who need a committee to respond to every question

That sounds like the government trying to stimulate the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: B.L. Ochman They’re the ones who need every word vetted by lawyers; who need a committee to respond to every question</p>
<p>That sounds like the government trying to stimulate the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.L. Ochman</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>B.L. Ochman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>Shel - the thing is: there are companies that shouldn&#039;t have any type of website. They&#039;re the ones who need every word vetted by lawyers; who need a committee to respond to every question, which then takes a week to get an answer.

If a company doesn&#039;t really want to facilitate conversation, WHY bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shel &#8211; the thing is: there are companies that shouldn&#8217;t have any type of website. They&#8217;re the ones who need every word vetted by lawyers; who need a committee to respond to every question, which then takes a week to get an answer.</p>
<p>If a company doesn&#8217;t really want to facilitate conversation, WHY bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>And I remember being told the lists of reasons for companies to not have email, followed by the lists of reasons to not have websites.

The times, they are a&#039; changing.

Maybe if we followed the advice of Mike Pusateri at Disney and not call them blogs, but rather &quot;an instant publishing system with regularly updated content subscribable via RSS that facilitates conversation and provides you with a vehicle for instant communication when it is required,&quot; then we could move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I remember being told the lists of reasons for companies to not have email, followed by the lists of reasons to not have websites.</p>
<p>The times, they are a&#8217; changing.</p>
<p>Maybe if we followed the advice of Mike Pusateri at Disney and not call them blogs, but rather &#8220;an instant publishing system with regularly updated content subscribable via RSS that facilitates conversation and provides you with a vehicle for instant communication when it is required,&#8221; then we could move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Thanks Janeth-- one of the things I love most about blogs is it has pretty much killed off the ugly DIY web site. Now it&#039;s the no-frills DIY blog, where people can concentrate on content and not whether they look good. 

Design is the next big step of course, and should be a big part of corporate blog planning,  but for personal blogs I breathed a sigh of relief and did not mourn the fact that I would never have to visit another Geocities page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Janeth&#8211; one of the things I love most about blogs is it has pretty much killed off the ugly DIY web site. Now it&#8217;s the no-frills DIY blog, where people can concentrate on content and not whether they look good. </p>
<p>Design is the next big step of course, and should be a big part of corporate blog planning,  but for personal blogs I breathed a sigh of relief and did not mourn the fact that I would never have to visit another Geocities page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janeth</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2009/01/31/social-media-top-5-its-not-about-you-mr-journalist-and-blogging-is-not-a-business-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>Janeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=819#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>There are lots of reasons to blog that have nothing to do with blogging. We set up a website that we do some affiliate marketing with, the top part we turned into a call to action and we put the blog post at the bottom of the page. 

We then hired someone to start writing post. We found the post ranked in a matter of moments and the call to action was able to convert a lot of the new traffic. We made a list of keywords and targeted those keywords in each post. 

It worked out better than a website would have ever worked and was easy for someone with no skills to make post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of reasons to blog that have nothing to do with blogging. We set up a website that we do some affiliate marketing with, the top part we turned into a call to action and we put the blog post at the bottom of the page. </p>
<p>We then hired someone to start writing post. We found the post ranked in a matter of moments and the call to action was able to convert a lot of the new traffic. We made a list of keywords and targeted those keywords in each post. </p>
<p>It worked out better than a website would have ever worked and was easy for someone with no skills to make post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

