Doug Haslam

Gischeleman: "To Create With the Mind"

By

Social Media Top 5: Buffering Obama, Lazy Readers, & PR No-Brainers

Has Obama broken a social media promise? – I have been very skeptical of the idea that President Obama’s will be a “social media” administration. Federal government seems to me the last fortress against transparency and interactivity- at least where it comes to adopting new methods- not to mention there are a lot of things a president could not be transparent about in the name of national security. Putting the Saturday addresses on YouTube seems a no-brainer– podcasting them, making them downloadable, I can see that. The fact that there is a blog, and a Director of New Media, Macon Phillips, is pretty cool though. It’s more than I expected, but probably less than others had. Just don’t expect Obama to “@” you on Twitter.

(By the way: more thorough piece on the topic from Jen Zingsheim at Media Bullseye).

720px-us-whitehouse-logosvg


A Quick note About the Inauguration:
Relying on streaming video and the Web in general to capture major world events- the ones that millions of people drop everything to observe? My experience Tuesday leaves me thinking the Web is still not ready for true prime-time mass adoption. No stream worked in our office- we all retired to the building cafeteria to watch on CNN. When you have TV, use it. As intriguing as the Facebook application was, the Web’s performance in general just didn’t cut it. It was like trying to use Twitter during Steve Jobs’ iPhone unveiling.

Echo Chamber or Lazysphere? Peter Kim is doing a brave thing in exhorting people to break our social media discussions out of the echo chamber. Brave because it’s comfortable to talk amongst ourselves and continually prove how smart we are about social media, and easy to say “No!” if someone asks us to turn things outward. This is the big challenge for those of us using social media; using it “to transform the way we live and work.” What I really was interested in in the second post linked above, was Peter’s reference to the “Lazysphere” – people don;t read things through. On the one hand we could cater to that impulse and produce lazy content for mass consumption- or, we could call on what i like to call the “responsibility of the audience” to read critically (what I often harp on) and to read thoroughly (probably more of what Peter’s emphasis is here). Wouldn’t that create a niche of committed audiences rather than an echo-chamber-busting mass appeal? Maybe the key to getting out of the echo chamber is creating those niches – new niches. Of course, I merrily continue writing about social media– but it is part of my work.

The Best Thing About blogging? More PR People See Things from a Journalist’s Eyes. Rohit Bhargava has a nice post, “What All PR People Should Know About Journalists,” which brings perspective more PR people have that they didn’t 10 years ago; many of them are getting pitches from other PR people and can see some of the industry’s worst practices first-hand. I’m just glad I have avoided the “PR bloggers getting pitched” crowd to this point.

Also, Rohit followed up with a “What Journalists Should Know About PR People” post. Great info in both posts– I know PR people are reading, but not sure enough journalists will admit to reading this (I dare you to comment there if you are!) for me to hope for a serious rapprochement.

Isn’t it time to Retire the “It Needs to be in Print or It Isn’t Important” Crap? Ten years ago in public relations, clients would often dismiss online placements if they didn’t appear in print also- there just wasn’t much authority in bits compared to ink. When I returned to agency life four years ago, it seemed that prejudiced had all but disappeared. Was I wrong? This video (from RealWire via the Bad pitch blog) give a nice, informative look at the benefits of online media placements; searchability, etc. Can anyone tell me they still need to explain this stuff to clients? Seriously, let me know.

The Online Media from RealWire on Vimeo.

Blog readers: I am riding the Pan-Mass Challenge this summer, a 2-day bicycle trek across Massachusetts to raise money for the Jimmy Fund in support of cancer research. Will you join the generous folks who have sponsored my ride? Click any part of this message to go to my fundraising page– and thank you!

6 Responses to Social Media Top 5: Buffering Obama, Lazy Readers, & PR No-Brainers

  1. We’re still having to educate folks about some of the most basic things in PR. The one GREAT thing about this is that they are so much more open to new ideas, methods, etc. The one BAD thing about this is that we’re having to take the time to educate them on this kinda stuff.

    HOWEVER, at the end of the day, I’d rather have a blank sponge soaking up everything we tell em’ vs. a person that thinks they ‘get it’ when it comes to PR & external communications and starts throwing out unrealistic demands.

  2. Shava Nerad says:

    On the Obama thang — and I said the same to Dave Winer on his blog and twitter — the Obama transition team had two months and US$12M and 450 people to set everything up. Blue State Digital is pretty savvy about the web, and did fine with some social media (iphone app?).

    But the whitehouse.gov site launched pretty much the moment it could. And I wouldn’t consider it a final product, or the limit of the administration’s investment in social media.

    Let’s face it, “echo chamber,” with the mess we’re in globally, it might be that a fully implemented social media strategy on day one of 100 wasn’t the proper top priority for the transition team.

    Y’think?

  3. Great topics all–as you know (thanks for the RT on the article) I’m highly skeptical of the White House’s ability to do much in the realm of social media. The lawyers won’t even let the staff have IM.

    And, I *so* wish the obsession with print would die. Hard to overcome the “thud” value (I saw that term on LinkedIn)of a clip book though. Client sees big book of paper–>PR firm must be doing its job.

    Have a great weekend!

    Jen

  4. Doug Haslam says:

    Narciso– yes, there are more people coming into this– “101s” will not go away soon.

    Shava — I would agree it’s not a top priority — see the link I added to the Media Bullseye piece– there are too many levels of secrecy and bureaucracy in federal government to make social media easy.

    Jen– Thud factor is an old fave in PR. You can always print out the online clips, right?

  5. Nora says:

    Hmm it appears like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up
    what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
    Do you have any tips for inexperienced blog writers?

    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

    My webpage: home living (Nora)

  6. Shawn S is expert writing articles on Epuffer quality e cigarette, E cigarette Starter Kit and cheap electronic cigars
    a high tech and better alternative to smoking. And remember-
    the most expensive and precious thing in our life is a health of yours and your
    loved ones. So, the question is, are electronic cigarettes going
    to become the newest craze, for both current and past smokers and even those who just want
    to give it a safe go.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>