<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groundswell- This started out as a review&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doughaslam.com/2008/12/29/groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doughaslam.com/2008/12/29/groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review</link>
	<description>Gischeleman: &#34;To Create With the Mind&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2008/12/29/groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=702#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>I think video is the least social of the &quot;social media.&quot; It&#039;s too much work to consume. Blendtec launched a lot of conversations, but Blendtec itself wasn&#039;t necessarily part of that dialogue-- nor did it have to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think video is the least social of the &#8220;social media.&#8221; It&#8217;s too much work to consume. Blendtec launched a lot of conversations, but Blendtec itself wasn&#8217;t necessarily part of that dialogue&#8211; nor did it have to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Hill</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2008/12/29/groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=702#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>You raise a good point with the BlendTec thing. For some reason, we&#039;ve come to believe that videos and podcasts are social media vehicles. I suppose the fact that anyone can set up a video is what puts the power in the hands of an individual, and that&#039;s why it has the potential to be social.. but it&#039;s a stretch.

..although, now that I think about it, it may be s subtle point about what is required in social media: something interesting that is worthy of people communicating about. It&#039;s the &quot;hook&quot;. 

In some of my client engagements, they know that they want some of this social media juice, but they don&#039;t really realize that there needs to be something for people to discuss.. it&#039;s not enough to throw a &quot;forward to a friend&quot; link on a website. Blendtec wasn&#039;t a platform that enabled people to talk, but it was SOMETHING for them to talk about, in a simple package that could be easily shared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise a good point with the BlendTec thing. For some reason, we&#8217;ve come to believe that videos and podcasts are social media vehicles. I suppose the fact that anyone can set up a video is what puts the power in the hands of an individual, and that&#8217;s why it has the potential to be social.. but it&#8217;s a stretch.</p>
<p>..although, now that I think about it, it may be s subtle point about what is required in social media: something interesting that is worthy of people communicating about. It&#8217;s the &#8220;hook&#8221;. </p>
<p>In some of my client engagements, they know that they want some of this social media juice, but they don&#8217;t really realize that there needs to be something for people to discuss.. it&#8217;s not enough to throw a &#8220;forward to a friend&#8221; link on a website. Blendtec wasn&#8217;t a platform that enabled people to talk, but it was SOMETHING for them to talk about, in a simple package that could be easily shared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://doughaslam.com/2008/12/29/groundswell-this-started-out-as-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughaslam.com/?p=702#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was astounded at the estimated cost- -$283,000 for the first year - of starting an executive blog. &quot;  What...kind of bullshit is that?  Blogs are free, except for the time...idiots..people like simple..all you need to do is write once a week, once a day and talk about what makes your company great...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was astounded at the estimated cost- -$283,000 for the first year &#8211; of starting an executive blog. &#8221;  What&#8230;kind of bullshit is that?  Blogs are free, except for the time&#8230;idiots..people like simple..all you need to do is write once a week, once a day and talk about what makes your company great&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

